Coincidentally, I just read your name in the Scientific American story! I immediately felt like this story was implausible when I heard it. I assume they are trying to cover up the real technology.
Is the standard abbreviation for Scientific American really SciAm? Can I recommend adding a hyphen so it’s written like this: [Sci-Am]? Sci-Am is still not great, but it should be moderately less tempting to drop the i and pronounce it “scam.”
FWIW: "SciAm" is very familiar to me, and has been for decades. Honestly never did see what it would be if you dropped the "i" -- the word is practically atomic to my sensing and processing equipment.
Coincidentally, I just read your name in the Scientific American story! I immediately felt like this story was implausible when I heard it. I assume they are trying to cover up the real technology.
Is the standard abbreviation for Scientific American really SciAm? Can I recommend adding a hyphen so it’s written like this: [Sci-Am]? Sci-Am is still not great, but it should be moderately less tempting to drop the i and pronounce it “scam.”
FWIW: "SciAm" is very familiar to me, and has been for decades. Honestly never did see what it would be if you dropped the "i" -- the word is practically atomic to my sensing and processing equipment.