Discussion about this post

User's avatar
fredm421's avatar

I liked the first John Wick movie quite a bit. As you say, stylized violence, done well. The sequels are pretty garbage, though.

You can argue that they're doing exactly the same thing as the first movie but I would disagree. The first movie had to establish characters (2D as they may be) and so the action was not entirely relentless. But, speaking of the action itself, movie 2 and 3 are unbearable in how repetitive the fight scenes are. How many times are goons going to advance (without cover) against John Wick's position only to have their gun blocked/immobilized and be gunned down without the ability to retaliate?

This is why, with modern guns especially, cover is essential and no one charges a defended position without at least constant covering fire (and ideally more in the form of body armor/shields/2 men team(s), more angles etc etc).

Is this a nitpick? I dunno. I am hardly a retired SAS so all of the above may be (is likely to be) gross over simplification. Yet goons/soldiers don't charge blindly into corners to get gunned down at point blank range. So yeah but no to John Wick 2 and 3. Ronin or Heat might be better options if you feel your kids can handle the more mature/realistic tone.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts